Which is more conducive to SEO optimization, static, dynamic, or pseudo-static URL structure?

If you know something about SEO, you should be more aware that there are three common URL expressions: static, dynamic, and pseudo-static. If it is strictly classified, pseudo-static is also a dynamic type, only expressed in the form of a static URL structure.

Basically, when we conduct systematic SEO operations on a website, we will analyze the URL of a website. If the URL contains complex dynamic forms of symbolic parameters, we will generally perform pseudo-static processing. This is done to improve the inclusion of websites, because there has always been a saying that search engines have limited ability to analyze and identify URLs, and if the parameters are too complex, it will be difficult to crawl. Then the processing of URLs is a very necessary step in SEO operations.

First, let's take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of the three URL structures: static, dynamic, and pseudo-static.

1. Static page

Advantages: Compared to the other two pages, it is the fastest. Not only is it the fastest loading speed, but it also does not need to extract data from the database. While it is fast, it will not put pressure on the server.

Disadvantages: Because the data is stored in HTML, the file is very large. And the most serious problem is that if you change the source code, you must change everything, but if you can't change one place, the static page of the entire station will automatically change. If a large website has a lot of data, it will take up a lot of server space, and a new HTML page will be created every time content is added. If it is not for professionals, it will be troublesome to maintain it.

SEO： Static pages are very friendly to search engines. As for why they are friendly, many individual webmasters may not know. We can find what search engines like directly from the advantages. What search engines like most is fast speed and fast website speed, which shows that your website server is very good. Although the improvement in speed is very slight, it may only be a few seconds or less, it may be just this little time. Make search engines like you more.

2. Dynamic page

Advantages: Space usage is very small. Generally, websites with tens of thousands of data use dynamic pages, which may only have a file size of a few M, while static pages are used as few as tens of M and as many as tens of M. Because data is called from the database, if you want to change some values and directly change the database, all dynamic pages will be automatically updated. This is a lot more beneficial than static pages.

Disadvantages: User access is slow, so why do they visit dynamic pages slowly? We must start with the access mechanism of dynamic pages. In fact, our server has an interpretation engine. When users visit, this interpretation engine will translate dynamic pages into static pages, so that everyone can check the source code in the browser. And this source code is the source code translated by the interpretation engine. In addition to the slow access speed, the data of dynamic pages is called from the database. If the number of visitors is very large, the pressure on the database will be very high. However, now dynamic programs use caching technology. But overall, dynamic pages put a lot of pressure on the server. At the same time, websites with dynamic pages generally require higher server requirements, and the more people visit at the same time, the greater the pressure on the server will be.

SEO: Many personal websites and corporate websites look down on dynamic pages. It is very wrong to say that search engines will not include dynamic page websites. Maybe other people's dynamic page websites include more than your static page. Of course, the prerequisite is that dynamic URLs should not carry too many complex parameters, such as symbols, etc. The way search engines include dynamic pages is the same, and there is no discrimination. The biggest difference is actually the difference in speed. This difference is very weak. As I mentioned earlier, most large websites use static pages because the pressure on the server is relatively small.

3. Pseudo-static

Advantages: Everyone knows that static pages are very beneficial to SEO, and static pages have a small load on the server, but the disadvantage of static pages is that they cannot be updated at any time. As for the advantages of pseudo-static, this is not easy to say. Compared with dynamic web pages, pseudo-static pages do not mention the improvement in speed. In comparison, because it is a "fake" static page, it is actually a dynamic page, and it also needs to be translated into a static page. The biggest benefit is to let search engines treat their own web pages as static pages.

Disadvantages: You can see the shortcomings from the name."Pseudo-static" is actually "pseudo-static". Will search engines treat it as a static page? This is just an analysis based on experience and logic, not necessarily accurate. Maybe search engines directly regard it as a dynamic page. We have worked so hard, but we have actually gotten nothing.

SEO: The advantage is that dynamic pages, such as www.honmau.com/? * 123.asp or www.honmau.com/?* 123.php, converted to www.honmau. com/123.html, but no one dares to say whether such a superficial conversion is good for search engines. But what we cannot be sure of cannot be assumed that it does not exist. Pseudo-static has the same effect on SEO as true static. When accessed, it will increase the server load, but it can be dynamically updated in real time and is indeed very convenient. As long as the load problem is controlled reasonably, the benefits of using pseudo-static are greater than true static, so pseudo-static technology is used in many forum programs and CMS content management programs.

Let's briefly summarize:

1. Using pure static and pseudo-static has no essential difference for SEO

2. Using pure static may cause hard disk damage and affect forum performance

3. Using pseudo-static will occupy a certain amount of CPU occupancy, and using it in large quantities will cause CPU overload.

4. The most important point is that we want static for SEO

5. Static website development costs are relatively high, so it is recommended to consider the cost for small and medium-sized enterprises.

So:

1. Using a purely static method can be directly eliminated, because no matter how it is generated, it will be very harmful to the hard disk.

2. Since pure pseudo-static has the same effect, we can choose pseudo-static.

3. However, heavy use of pseudo-static will cause CPU overload.

4. So we just need not use it in large quantities.

5. Since static is only for SEO, we only need pseudo-static for SEO, not for users to use.

6. So we just need to use pseudo-static in the Archiver specially provided for SEO crawlers.